LOGIC OF FORMING THE CONCEPT "WEAPONS": UTILITARIAN AND TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECT

Igor Vasyliev

Abstract


These theses are considered and proven: weapon as a material thing has an artificial nature, which, in turn, has the following main features - the material it is made of, weapon shape, capacity for replication; weapon as a material thing has a utilitarian purpose of creation; weapon as a social tool can be used both for its intended attributive purpose (ability to cause damage - damage to a particular object in a particular way), and for indirect modus purpose (not related to the ability of causing damage). The issue of wording the definition of the concept of “weapon” is analyzed in terms of different branches of law and branch differences in the definition are studied. The classification criteria are determined and specific taxa of the factor “weapon as a material thing” are formed. Synthesis of specific taxa by the criteria of “the ways of impact of weapons on a living being” and “the way of the weapons’ functioning” are considered. Based on the combination of hypotheses about “the artificiality of weapons” and " utilitarian purpose of creating weapons” the definition of the concept of “weapons as a material thing” is formed. Subject to the terms of attributive and modus social purpose of weapons, the definition of “weapons as a social tool’ is formed. A comprehensive definition of the concept of “a weapon” is worded.

Keywords


means; weapon; utilitarian purpose of creation; artificial thing

References


Amelchenko, N. A. (2011). Aristotel. Politychna Еntsyklopediia / NAN Ukrainy; In-t polit. i etnonats. dosl. im. I.F. Kurasa; Hol. red. Yu. LevenetsK, 39-40.

Bilenchuk, P. D., Kofanov A. V., & Suliava, O. F. (2004). Zbroieznavstvo: pravovi osnovy obihu vohnestrilnoi zbroi. Porivnialnyi analiz vitchyznianoho ta zarubizhnoho zakonodavstva: Ukraina. Yevropa. Svit : monohrafiia, Kyiv: Mizhnarodna orhanizatsiia „VeeZope”.

Boiko, V. F. (2002). Suddia yak tsentralna fihura v sudovii reformi. Visnyk Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy, 4, 2–6.

Vasyliev I. V., Frolov O.S. (2012). Klasyfikatsiia zbroi za sposobom vplyvu na zhyvu istotu. Aktualni pytannia publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava: tezy dopovidei III Mizhnar. nauk-prakt. konf. 03 zhovt. 2012 r. / za red. V.M. Oharenka ta in., 346 –347.

Vlasov, V. P. (2001). Kriminologicheskaja harakteristika i preduprezhdenie nezakonnogo oborota oruzhija: avtoref. diss. na soisk… kand. jurid. nauk, Moscow, 7.

Gamov V.I. (1996). Oruzhie kak fenomen kultury: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk: 24.00.01, Rostov-na-Donu, 7.

Kessidi F. H. (1983). Jeticheskie sochinenija Aristotelja. Aristotel. Sochinenija, Moscow: Mysl, 4, 830.

Koreckij, D. A. (1997). Tjazhkie vooruzhennye prestuplenija. Kompleksnoe kriminologicheskoe issledovanie tjazhkih prestuplenij, sovershaemyh s primeneniem oruzhija / D.A.Koreckij. Moscow.

Kuznecova I. A. (2003). Konstitucionno-pravovye problemy realizacii prava grazhdan na zashhitu s ispolzovaniem oruzhija : dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk: 12.00.02 : Chelyabinsk.

Lorenc K. (1998). Tak nazyvaemoe zlo. K estestvennoj teorii agressii. K. Lorenc Oborotnaja storona zerkala, Moscow: Respublika, 62. Izbr. glavy (s sokrashh.). Retrieved from: http://www.e-reading.club/chapter.php/1022205/14/Konrad_-_Tak_nazyvaemoe_zlo.html.

Lyubchenko V.S. (1998). Znannya v konteksti praktyk. Retrieved from http://psm.in.ua/psm/04.aspx-753.html.

Martynovich S.F. (2000). Javlenija i veshhi: Nachala filosofii nauki: ucheb. posobie. Saratov: Izd-vo Povolzhsk. mezhreg. ucheb. centra.

Mykhnyuk V.V. (2009). Zbroya yak obiekt tsyvilno-pravovykh vidnosyn. Naukovyy Visnyk Nats. un-tu DPS, 3, 260.

Losev, A.F., Asmus, V.F., Taho-Godi, A.A. (1994). Platon Sobranie sochinenij v 4 t. Moscow, vol. 3, 390.

Ruchkin V. A. (2003). Oruzhie i sledy ego primenenija. “Chernye dyry” v Rossijskom Zakonodatelstve: Juridicheskij zhurnal, 1, 9- 11.

Buchilo, N. F., Chumakov, A.N. (2001). Filosofija: uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: PER SE.

Frolov, O. S. (2006). Vyznachennya ponyat' «zbroya yak rich material'noho svitu» ta «zbroya yak sotsial'ne yavyshche». Pravo i Suspil'stvo: Naukovyy zhurnal, 3, 39-41.

Frolov, O. S. (2006). Osoblyvosti vyznachennya ponyattya “zbroya” v riznykh haluzyakh prava. Forum vchenykh-administratyvistiv Pivdenno-skhidnykh rehioniv Ukrayiny: Tezy dopovidey, m. Zaporizhzhya, 26-27 zhovtnya 2006 r. Zaporizhzhya: ZNU, 141-145.

Shilov, S. E. (2013). Ritoricheskaja teorija chisla Retrieved from http://www.chronos.msu.ru/old/RREPORTS/shilov-ritoricheskaya_teoriya_chisel.pdf.

Jarovoj, A. V. (2010). Agonalnost kak stremlenie bytija byt. Istoricheskaja i Socialno-Obrazovatelnaja Mysl', Krasnodar, 4(6), 38.

Кapp, E. (1978). Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kultur aus neuen Gesichtspunkten, Braunsch weig: Westermann, 1877. Neudruck: Düsseldorf. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/stream/grundlinieneine00kappgoog#page/n23/mode/2up.

Malinowski, B. A. (1960). Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays. Galaxy Books, OUP, New York, Р.151. Retrieved from: http://monoskop.org/images/f/f5/Malinowski_Bronislaw_A_Scientific_Theory_of_Culture_and_Other_Essays_1961.pdf.

Martin Heidegger – Die Frage nach der Technik (1999). Ausarbeitung, 13 Seiten. Retrieved from: http://www.grin.com/de/e-book/99807/martin-heidegger-die-frage-nach-der-technik.

Turner, W. (1903). History of Philosophy, Boston: S.T.D Ginn and Company Proprietors, Retrieved from http://filozofia.3bird.net/download/filozofia/historia_filozofii/filozofia-william-turner-history-of-philosophy.pdf.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Igor Vasyliev

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN (Print) : 2449-7320

ISSN (Online) : 2449-8726