Vitaliy Kovalchuk, Iryna Sofinska, Yaryna Bohiv


This article mainly focuses on determination of sovereignty as the answer to challenges, caused by globalization, migration, and integration. In the modern view, sovereignty is a fundamental state feature, while citizenship is a real and effective political and legal link between person and state. Citizenship is a primary legal aspect of self-identity from the theoretical, legal and philosophical point of view. It should be mentioned that nowadays, there are a lot of discussions on this issue in order to determine possible strong ideological baggage, the set of rights and duties and full membership in a state (features of citizenship) from daily and personal complexity of social interaction (features of self-identity). Undoubtedly, the correct, up-to-date application of person’s legal status and identity issues is a fundamental tension in frames of such triangle: person – society – sovereign state. The article explains that such importance depends not only upon the level of legal self-consciousness of a person, geopolitical, social and economic, demographic development of society and state’s place on the international arena, but also on active state (governmental) policy in the field of citizenship.

Authors pay particular attention to the grounds for terminating the citizenship of a person, as a result of which a person may become "apatride" (a stateless person). In addition, this study is aimed to generalize the common and distinctive features of the main grounds for termination of citizenship of a person, which depends on the will of last one or is foreseen as the state "punishment" for his/her activity.
According to the results of this research, the value of citizenship in the modern world is inevitably to become lower. Therefore, in the ideal scenario, it is necessary to upgrade the citizenship concept, to proceed with real, proper and useful, but not cosmetic changes. In addition, there is a need to allow drifting on the citizenship front to secure values and shared symbols of citizenship in the sovereign state.


sovereignty; citizenship; loss of citizenship; withdrawal of citizenship; lapse of citizenship; denaturalization

Full Text:



Abraham, D. (2008). Constitutional patriotism, citizenship, and belonging. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(1), 137–152.

Béland, D. (2005). Insecurity, Citizenship, and Globalization: The Multiple Faces of State Protection. Sociological Theory, 23(1), 25–41.

Bellamy, R. (2015). Citizenship: Historical Development. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 643-649.

Bellamy, R. (2013). Citizenship: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Blatter, J. (2011). Dual citizenship and theories of democracy. Citizenship Studies, 15(6-7), 769- 798.

Bloemraad, I., Korteweg, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2008). Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 153- 179.

Carrera, S. (2014). How much does EU citizenship cost? The Maltese citizenship-for-sale affair: A breakthrough for sincere cooperation in citizenship of the union? CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe No. 64, April/2014.

Constitution of Ukraine (1996). Retrieved 10.10.2018 from

de Groot, G., & Vonk, O. (2018). Acquisition of Nationality by Birth on a Particular Territory or Establishment of Parentage: Global Trends Regarding Ius Sanguinis and Ius Soli. Netherlands International Law Review, 65, 319–335.

Derzhava i hromadjans’ke suspil’stvo v Ukrajini: problemy vzajemodiji (2007). Monograph [Кre-sina I., Skrypnjuk О.]; І. Kresina (ed.) – К.: «Logos», P. 64. (in Ukrainian).

European convention on nationality (1997). European Treaty Series No. 166 Retrieved 10.10.2018 from

Flournoy, R. W. (1921). Dual Nationality and Election. Yale Law Journal, Volume XXX, Issue 6. P. 546.

Fox, J. (2005). Unpacking “transnational citizenship”. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 171- 201.

Habermas, Jü. (1994). ‘Citizenship and National Identity’ in Steenbergen B. van (ed), The Con-dition of Citizenship, SAGE publications

Habermas, J. (1992). Citizenship and National Identity: Some Reflections on the Future of Eu-rope. Praxis International, 12(1), 1–19.

Heater D. (1990). Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History Politics and Education, London.

Howard, M. M. (2012). The Politics of Citizenship in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

Isin, E. F., & Turner, Br. S. (2002). Citizenship studies: An introduction. In: Isin, Engin F. and Turn¬er, Bryan S. eds. Handbook of citizenship studies. - London, UK: Sage, pp. 1–10.

Jamieson, L. (2002). Theorising identity, nationality and citizenship: implications for European citizenship identity. Sociológia, 34(6), 507-532.

Jevropejs’ky slovnyk filosofij: leksykon neperekladnostej (2009). Volume I. / B. Cassin (chair). К.: «Duh i litera», 576 p. (P. 166) (in Ukrainian).

Joppke, C. (2012). Citizenship and Immigration. Ethnicities, 12(6), 844–863.

Law of Ukraine on Citizenship (2001). Retrieved 10.10.2018 from

Ludvik, V. (2009). Pryntsyp narodnoho suverenitetu v istoriji polityko-pravovoji dumky, teoriji prava ta politychnij praktytsi / Kharkiv, 20 p. (in Ukrainian).

McFadden, S. (2019). German citizenship law and the Turkish diaspora. German Law Journal, 20(1), 72-88.

Marshall, T. H. (1949/92) ‘Citizenship and social class’, in T.H. Marshall and T.Bottomore, Citi-zenship and social class, London: Pluto Press

Mazzolari, F. (2009). Dual citizenship rights: do they make more and richer citizens? Demogra¬phy, 46, 169–191.

Mergé Case—Decision No. 55 (1955). Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Volume 10, June 1955, pp. 236—248.

Mouritsen, P. (2002). Virtue, size, and liberty: republican citizenship at the American founding. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 6, 126–75.

Mouritsen, P. (2013). The resilience of citizenship traditions: Civic integration in Germany, Great Britain and Denmark. Ethnicities, 13(1), 86–109.

Nottebohm Case (1955). Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, ICJ, Reports. – p. 315.

Orgad, L. (2018). Cloud Communities: The Dawn of Global Citizenship?. In: Bauböck R. (eds) Debating Transformations of National Citizenship. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer, Cham

Pilgram, L. (2011). International Law and European Nationality Laws / EUDO Citizenship Observatory. Comparative Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-Comp /1. P. 3.

Pogonyi, S. (2011). Dual citizenship and sovereignty. Nationalities Papers, 39(5), 685-704.

Pohorilko, V., & Fedorenko, V. (2006). Konstytutsijne pravo Ukrajiny: К.: «Naukova dumka», «Pretsedent», pp. 113-114.

Postnati. Calvin case (1608). Trin. 6 Jac. 1. – рр. 379–406.

Price, P. J. (1997). Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin’s Case (1608). Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 9(73), 97–132. Retrieved 10.10.2018 from

Rottman, J., & Bayern, F. (2010). Case C-135/08. 2 March 2010. Retrieved 10.10.2018 from

Sassen, S. (2003). The Repositioning of Citizenship: Emergent Subjects and Spaces for Politics. CR The New Centennial Review, 3(2), 41-66.

Schneider H. (2005). Migration, Integration and Citizenship: a ChaUenge for Europe's Future. Forum Maastricht Conference Migration and Integration: tuwards a European Policy. Maastricht, Netherlands.

Seubert, S. (2014). Dynamics of Modern Citizenship Democracy and Peopleness in a Global Era. Constellations, 21(4), 547-559.

Six Books of the Commonwealth by Jean Bodin, Abridged and translated by M. J. Tooley [Pub-lished 1955. No copyright asserted. Retrieved 10.10.2018 from

Shaw, J. (2007). The Transformation of Citizenship in the European Union: Electoral Rights and the Restructuring of Political Space (Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shcherbanyuk, О. (2013). Narodnyj suverenitet i realizatsija vladospromozgnosti demokratych-noji gerzgavy: monograph. Volume ІІ. К.: «Logos», 306 p. (in Ukrainian).

Sofinska, I. (2018). Philosophic and Legal Vision of Citizenship Doctrine. - Lviv, Kamenyar, P. 54. (in Ukrainian)

Steinhardt, M. F. (2012). Does citizenship matter? The economic impact of naturalizations in Ger¬many. Labour Economics, 19(6), 813-823.

Tilly, C. (1995). Citizenship, Identity and Social History. International Review of Social History, 40(S3), 1-17.

‘The Canevaro Case at the Hague Source’ (1912). The American Journal of International Law 709 6(3)

Tochiy, V. (2016). Mezhi derzhavnoho suverenitetu: teorija ta praktyka. Prykarpats’ky jurydychny visnyk. Issue 1. pp. 78-81. (in Ukrainian).

Turner, B. S. (1990). Outline of a Theory of Citizenship. Sociology, 24(2), 189–217.

UN Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (1961). United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 989, p. 175 Retrieved 10.10.2018 from

‘U. S. A. ex rel. Flegenheimer v. Italy’ (1959). 53(4) The American Journal of International Law 944

Vanberg, V. J. (2006). Democracy, Citizen Sovereignty and Constitutional Economics. Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 06/2. Walter Eucken Institut e.V.

Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia / t 2: Filosofiia prava Maksymov S (holova) ta inshi, (Pravo 2017) pp. 161–166. (in Ukrainian).

Weiler, J. H. H. (1997). To be a European citizen – Eros and civilization. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 495-519.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Vitaliy Kovalchuk, Iryna Sofinska, Yaryna Bohiv

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN (Print) : 2449-7320

ISSN (Online) : 2449-8726